The Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, has responded to Akhilesh Yadav's remarks about the bulldozer. CM Yogi asserted that not every individual can manage a bulldozer and that those who surrender to rioters certainly cannot. He directed these comments at Akhilesh Yadav as he is well aware of it.
Akhilesh Yadav stated that once his party forms the government in 2027, all bulldozers in the state will be directed towards Gorakhpur. His reaction came in the wake of the Supreme Court's remarks on the bulldozer action.
'Dreams of Mungerilal...', CM Yogi's Jibe
The Chief Minister further commented that those who plundered before 2017 now aspire to become 'Tipu Sultan'. Referring to a television show 'Mungerilal Ke Haseen Sapne', he said that when given a chance, they played with the futures of the youth.
Yogi Promises Equal Opportunity for All Candidates
CM Yogi emphasized that today, youth from any district receive equal opportunities. Those engaging in dishonesty will have their properties seized. These people have plunged the state into riots and pitted castes against each other. CM Yogi highlighted that a transparent process by the commission has selected candidates for 13 departments without any caste or district bias. Transparency in recruitment has been achieved over seven and a half years, something that was previously unattainable, but has been corrected now.
What Did Akhilesh Yadav Say?
Akhilesh Yadav was reviewing party work at the SP office in Gorakhpur when he made remarks about the bulldozer action, stating that once his party forms the government in 2027, all bulldozers in the state will be directed towards Gorakhpur. His reaction followed the Supreme Court's critical comments on the bulldozer action. He also claimed that the government is wrongfully implicating innocent people.
'If SP Forms Government in 2027, Bulldozers Will Head to Gorakhpur', Akhilesh's Attack on CM Yogi
Supreme Court's Stern Remarks on Bulldozer Action
The Supreme Court raised serious questions about the bulldozer action, stating that demolishing someone's house merely based on accusations is not justifiable. The court questioned the government and administrative actions, insisting that even a guilty person cannot have their home destroyed.
